The Green Inferno Review May 2026

The plot follows a naive group of New York college activists led by the idealistic Justine (Lorenza Izzo). After witnessing the eviction of an indigenous village for a logging conglomerate, they hijack a plane to the Peruvian Amazon to chain themselves to bulldozers and stage a "non-violent protest." Their mission succeeds, briefly, until their return flight crashes deep in the jungle. They are captured by the very tribe they were trying to save—a tribe that, it turns out, practices ritualistic dismemberment and cannibalism.

The Green Inferno burns bright on the surface, but underneath, there’s nothing but ash. the green inferno review

Furthermore, the characters are so insufferably stupid and self-righteous that their deaths elicit not horror, but relief. The lone comic relief character—a stoner who smuggles weed in a body cavity—delivers jokes that land with a thud. When the film tries to pivot to genuine pathos in its final act, the audience has long since checked out. The most damning issue is the film’s treatment of its female lead. Justine is subjected to a specific, extended threat of sexual violence that serves no narrative purpose other than to remind us that Roth has played in this sandbox before ( Hostel ). It is gratuitous in the worst sense: not shocking to illuminate a theme, but shocking because Roth seems to think that’s what "hardcore horror" demands. The plot follows a naive group of New

Then go watch Cannibal Holocaust with a critical eye, or better yet, seek out Embrace of the Serpent —a film that actually respects the Amazon and its people. The Green Inferno burns bright on the surface,

Director: Eli Roth Starring: Lorenza Izzo, Ariel Levy, Daryl Sabara, Kirby Bliss Blanton Genre: Horror / Exploitation Runtime: 100 minutes

The cinematography, too, captures the oppressive humidity and alien beauty of the jungle. Roth knows how to frame a landscape to make it feel like a cage. The fatal flaw of The Green Inferno is its staggering lack of self-awareness. Roth attempts to critique activist naivete, but his script is just as naive. The indigenous tribe is portrayed as a monolithic, screeching, one-dimensional threat—exactly the kind of "noble savage turned savage brute" trope that the genre should have retired forty years ago.

Unlike Ruggero Deodato’s Cannibal Holocaust —which was undeniably racist and exploitative but at least contained a meta-critique of media sensationalism—Roth offers nothing. He gives the tribe no language, no personality, no motive beyond ritualistic hunger. They are simply obstacles with machetes. For a film ostensibly about Western arrogance, it is ironically the most arrogant kind of filmmaking: using a real culture as a wallpaper of terror without a shred of anthropological curiosity.